— OPINION —
I grew up in the Los Angeles area and have been living here again for the past few years. The multiple wildfires are devastating in so many ways and the past week has shown an overwhelming amount of community donation sites, volunteering and engagement to support those most impacted.
Now more than ever, food banks and donation drives play a critical role in providing sustenance and hope to those affected. This past weekend, my wife and I witnessed first-hand the efforts at a huge pop-up operation at a racetrack near Pasadena. I saw seemingly endless lines of cars and trucks arriving to drop off water, food, pet items, clothing, and more. Scores of people showed up to volunteer their time collecting and sorting and helping in many other ways.
Yet the ethics of giving — particularly in times of crisis — demand a thoughtful examination to ensure efforts are both impactful and equitable. From ensuring food safety to addressing donor biases, the complexities of emergency food aid deserve careful scrutiny.
Who deserves aid? Understanding the broad impact
While the immediate assumption may be that food donations are only for families who lost their homes, the reality is much broader. Crises ripple outward, affecting a wide range of individuals:
• People who lost homes.
• People who lost businesses.
• Employees of destroyed businesses who suddenly find themselves without income.
• Contract workers — like gardeners, housecleaners, caregivers, and a wide range of other types of personal assistants — whose workplaces no longer exist.
• Families hosting evacuees who face additional strain on their resources.
• First responders and utility workers deployed to the disaster zone, often with limited access to food.
Ethical donation practices require donors to recognize this complex web of need. Aid must be distributed without judgment or exclusion, even if some recipients don’t fit preconceived ideas of who “deserves” help.
Ethical questions in donating food and water
1. How can donors avoid judgment and bias?
It’s easy to become frustrated by stories of aid misuse or to worry about “moochers.” However, focusing on those who exploit the system undermines the efforts of volunteers and food banks striving to help the majority who genuinely need support.
Considerations:
Donors should focus on intent: contributing to relief efforts with compassion and trust in the systems managing distribution. Misuse is a logistical challenge, not an ethical failure of the effort itself.
2. How do we ensure safety in donated food?
Crises create urgency, but food safety cannot be an afterthought. Donated food must be safe, shelf-stable, and appropriately labeled to prevent further harm to those already in need.
Considerations:
• Donors should prioritize non-perishable, nutrient-rich foods like canned vegetables, beans, rice, and pasta.
• Avoid homemade or expired goods, as they may introduce foodborne illness risks.
• Water donations should be sealed and meet regulatory safety standards.
• Those collecting foods should first check dates and condition — and determine if refrigeration or other requirements need to be met.
3. How can donors make the greatest impact?
Not all donations are equally useful. For example, a food bank inundated with sugary snacks or perishable items may struggle to meet the long-term needs of recipients. Additionally, logistical challenges arise when donations include items requiring refrigeration or special preparation.
Considerations:
• Research the specific needs of local food banks before donating.
• Consider monetary donations, which allow organizations to purchase exactly what’s needed.
• When donating food, focus on balanced nutrition: proteins, grains, and shelf-stable fruits and vegetables.
Rebuilding trust in volunteering and donations
Volunteers often face criticism or frustration over perceived inefficiencies or abuses of aid. This can discourage people from contributing when their efforts are needed most.
To rebuild trust in relief systems:
• Acknowledge the value of volunteers: Their character should be judged by their willingness to serve, not the behavior of a few bad actors.
• Focus on system improvements: Address inefficiencies in food distribution and donation logistics, not the motives of those contributing.
• Champion transparency: Relief organizations should communicate clearly about how donations are used, fostering donor confidence.
The core principle: It’s not food unless it’s safe food
In times of crisis, the desire to help must be balanced with the responsibility to ensure safety. Unsafe or poorly managed food donations can exacerbate an already dire situation. Food safety professionals play a vital role in ensuring donations meet standards that protect recipients.
Relief efforts should prioritize:
• Safe storage and transportation: Food banks must adhere to temperature controls and proper storage to avoid spoilage.
• Clear labeling: Recipients need to know what they’re consuming, especially those with allergies or dietary restrictions.
• Rapid response systems: Donations must be distributed quickly to minimize waste and ensure freshness.
Compassion with caution
The ethical responsibility of food aid extends beyond the act of giving. Donors, volunteers, and food safety professionals must collaborate to ensure that relief efforts are inclusive, impactful and safe. By focusing on the broader network of need and committing to responsible practices, we can address both the immediate and long-term food security challenges posed by disasters like the Los Angeles wildfires.
Ultimately, every contribution, no matter how small, carries the potential to restore hope and dignity to those affected.
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News,click here)
